虢国 

开端 终结 在位 

　　虢城公 与周穆王为同时期君主
　　由于班簋不知何时何地出土,长期以来,学者对班簋及虢城公其人所属时代的考释颇有争议.本文以为班簋应为穆王时器,虢城公又称虢城公遣,应生活在昭王之世乃至穆王初年.毛公更服之城应在东虢,亦即郑地之虢,虢城公是东虢之君,而非西虢之君.本文以为班簋应为穆王时器,虢城公又称虢城公遣,应生活在昭王之世乃至穆王初年。毛公更服之城应在东虢
　　(试论班簋所属时代兼及虢城公其人--《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年06期)

　　Since I do not know when and where BanGui unearthed a long time, scholars and Guo BanGui City public of its people belong Explanation times controversial. This should be Mu Gui classes that when the device, also known as Guo Guo city city public removal of public should be living in the early years of King Zhao of the world and even King Mu. Maogong more city services should be in the East Guo, that is, to the Guo Zheng, Guo Guo City Public Prince of the East, not West, Prince of Guo. This thought Reinterpretation when the device should be Mu, also known as Guo Guo city city public company laid off, should be living in the early years of King Zhao of the world and even the King Mu. City of gross public service should be more in East Guo