虢國 

開端 終結 在位 

　　虢城公 與周穆王為同時期君主
　　由於班簋不知何時何地出土,長期以來,學者對班簋及虢城公其人所屬時代的考釋頗有爭議.本文以為班簋應為穆王時器,虢城公又稱虢城公遣,應生活在昭王之世乃至穆王初年.毛公更服之城應在東虢,亦即鄭地之虢,虢城公是東虢之君,而非西虢之君.本文以為班簋應為穆王時器,虢城公又稱虢城公遣,應生活在昭王之世乃至穆王初年。毛公更服之城應在東虢
　　(試論班簋所屬時代兼及虢城公其人--《河南師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)》2006年06期)

　　Since I do not know when and where BanGui unearthed a long time, scholars and Guo BanGui City public of its people belong Explanation times controversial. This should be Mu Gui classes that when the device, also known as Guo Guo city city public removal of public should be living in the early years of King Zhao of the world and even King Mu. Maogong more city services should be in the East Guo, that is, to the Guo Zheng, Guo Guo City Public Prince of the East, not West, Prince of Guo. This thought Reinterpretation when the device should be Mu, also known as Guo Guo city city public company laid off, should be living in the early years of King Zhao of the world and even the King Mu. City of gross public service should be more in East Guo