Events: Teacher guidance: PubMed mathematics lesson should be learned on the sprint review
| Event Details:
Review of mathematics, enhanced with sprint at this stage of PubMed let some of the candidates feel the need to review math anxiety. Many students find themselves review for so long, do Zhenti or wrong a lot. Many students began to anxiety, worry, like the cat on hot bricks.
So how to solve this difficulty can review it, the sky of the class I talked a lot, like everyone in this detailed explanation in how to do this time of the review. Solve all the mathematical difficulties.
Many students, regardless of the class had not been to my students, are using the sea tactics, began to make mention of review questions. In fact, this time to do a lot of questions, you can improve such as do you want to achieve the correct rate is Zhenti do little.
Several common phenomenon:
1, casually mention to start out to do
2, does not sum up the wrong title
3, no plans
We review these types of phenomenon is common to several phenomena, the prevalence of these types of phenomena has led to many students in the final review stage of the problem of violence continue to leak out, so will have a review on the bottleneck.
Then we encountered at this stage how to break through the bottleneck?
We refer to the following several methods:
1, combined with the outline, which test sites to find their own textbooks, knowledge is not acquired, review these key knowledge points.
2, do the questions must be ways you can stick with a type, rather than aimlessly do. Find more representative of the subject to do, done after a summary of their way to make the purpose of such practice, the law. General types of questions do a 2-3 on it. Not need to do a lot.
3, treatment Zhenti it, not only for their own problems seriously wrong, wrong questions of their own but also careful study. With the answer, summarize methods. This is done Zhenti approach, we have to learn is a method, rather than demanding the right rate.
4, attention to basic theorems, formulas, do not overlook the smallest of the knowledge points.
How do we respond to the above is a good review of mathematical methods in this phase, specifically, replicability, by way of a representative summary of the subject, came up with this type of subject how to answer. Then while strengthening basic knowledge of the review, so that through a planned, purposeful, targeted review, you can help students to break through the bottleneck of this stage of review.
(Editor: Tang Yue) |
|
|