Events: Experts: U.S. has always been high-handed reckless use of force against the DPRK can not be underest
| Event Details:
Experts: U.S. has always been high-handed reckless use of force against North Korea can not be underestimated its possible LONDON
To prepare for November 28 to December 1 for the US-ROK military exercises in the Yellow Sea unexpected happens, Naoto Kan, Japanese Prime Minister asked all cabinet members during military exercises in principle, to remain in Tokyo, critical moment to be able to get by in 1 hour under the jurisdiction of ministries and agencies. Shelling North and South Korea, the Japanese Government, through the additional P3C patrol aircraft and electronic reconnaissance EP3 strengthen vigilance. In addition, the Air Self-Defense Force to Bang Matsumoto (Shizuoka Prefecture) of the air warning AWACS control unit also has entered the 24-hour standby. Although the chief Paradise Valley by the people at the press conference, said: "do not think the present situation is an armed attack, or close to the situation in an armed attack," but worried that the Japanese rulers happen "armed attack situation," the anxiety was obvious to all .
As we all know, the United States use of force is a good country, which has long been the U.S. government in October 2001 in the name of counter-terrorism war in Afghanistan, and in March 2003 despite strong opposition at home and abroad, insisting on fabricated reasons for the fact that the Iraq war the proof. Now, however, many people in Asia, the United States the possibility of war seems again underestimated, reflecting the number of people in the U.S. high-handed, reckless character of some lack of knowledge.
So, why the United States stress the Japanese study was not such an action against the DPRK operational plan? This fact is the United States for global strategy to strengthen the US-Japan military alliance is an important tool. International politics scholars generally believe that alliance have fundamentally from the member states are a common threat that the more clear, the vitality of the stronger alliance. However, with the Soviet Union, the Cold War, Japan-US alliance lost the Soviet Union the "common enemy" and thus face the common threat of losing or "sense of common threat," the body as the League of life, "the first driving force," the danger of this crisis sense of conflict with Japan and the U.S. economy, although still very sharp, and the United States felt the need for the Japan-US alliance as soon as possible to find common, "not abstract" threat to a complete end to an emerging Japan "Japan-US alliance after the Cold War is no longer necessary exist "mood, the Japanese honestly feel that they alone can not deal with facing a threat of deliberately raised this" threat "of serious, so that the security interests against such threats must be greater than the alliance to pay costs.
Since 1994, the United States planned a second Korean War, perhaps we can determine the current U.S. triumphantly to vigorously exercise the Yellow Sea to the use of force is not necessarily true. However, the U.S. military action against North Korea will have many benefits, in addition to consolidating the alliance, but also expected to destroy the North Korean nuclear program, with the war to get rid of the U.S. economic crisis and so on. Given that the U.S. high-handed, reckless, good character of the use of force, the two Koreas need to be very careful to avoid playing the brink of war strategy, especially to avoid the recurrence of accidental discharge incidents, so as not to get burned, asking for trouble. (The writer is a researcher at the Japanese Academy of Social Sciences.) |
|
|