Read works of She Hongsheng at 小说之家 | |||
Martial arts reader usually not an unfamiliar name, this name is Ye Hongsheng. Ye Hongsheng is not a martial arts writer, is a professional martial arts of reading and martial arts critic. He works for the martial arts writer and has a very comprehensive understanding of written many articles on introductory comments, which studies and reviews in the martial arts field, there is a certain status, even say that he was in the field position and Jin Yong in Martial Arts Fiction areas of considerable status. However, he does not like most critics of Jin Yong's respected as an attempt to promote an objective rather than independence, reading widely, informative, for the martial arts of the reader with invaluable information.
Some may say that you think Ye Hongsheng view strange reason, because his assessment of Jin Yong and Gu Long is not high, not to mention Wen Jui, Huang Yi Liang Yusheng and Yat Siu, etc., and most commentators different . It said that in fact true, as critics have a point of view it is more rare, but this is superficial, if he had discussed the logic of people think he does not make sense because the underlying theory of Ye Hongsheng big way problems, even baffling. Strange place still is too obviously there are some articles Ye Hongsheng is respected Jin Yong, but is concentrated in this comment subversive view of the past, not that they are objective, but rather an overkill, deviated from the other direction, so find it very strange. Ye Hongsheng said, "re-evaluator - only" the Italian Job's is not ", Jin Yong's famous commentary for" Eagle Shooting Heroes, "the old and new versions of the article gains and losses. This with as few" Pingzongxiaying Memories "(197 three years) a very different creature, a far cry!, marked with the author from childishness to maturity of the political consciousness. Where the blind worship of Jin Yong's novels for the "Golden School" who can not be missed. "to intentionally reflect on their past views and generate new ideas, of course, is good, but the tone here and the article itself (as discussed later) to see, Ye Hongsheng here to say that someone "blind worship of Jin Yong" is clearly the view that only his own right, others are naive and superficial view, of course not worship Jin Yong, but he was here to worship their own "progress" on a more serious problem.
For Ye Hongsheng's comments are "professional" and "naive" point of view, the following will be discussed one by one.
Read the introduction and commentary leaves the reader who can not help but gasp in admiration at the fact that: Mr. Ye Hongsheng's great surprise, two decades on end, reading so many martial arts, absolute as was the "professional" word readers. More surprising is: this is likely as Ye Hongsheng educated, creative theory of modern intellectuals with some knowledge of, the actually able to read after so many martial arts, is still just stood pure "martial arts reader" position to comment on.
In fact, Ye Hongsheng occasionally cite a modern literary point of view, the creation of the modern position to do some of the comments. But this result is obtained by direct conclusion is not consistent with his views, then he will add a "but" the creation of martial arts back to the position to support his point of view. If he works on the evaluation also note Louzhu, said, "Shushan", plot extravagance, to complicate the matter with the departure from the modern creation theory, but say the audience to their own value.
Ye Hongsheng's "professional" quality, but also in his understanding of the martial arts on the story, such as rivers and lakes predecessors, the origin of all martial arts, the doors sectarian origin, have reached an unprecedented state, I am afraid no one will follow those of the , can not help but admire the sincere praise. However, these, although Ye Hongsheng his repeated emphasis on how meaningful, how important, but not for general comments by the attention because, in the martial arts martial arts description, the original composition of mostly illusory, readers rarely get to the bottom, create a more solid play down the martial arts under the trend of the significance of naturally smaller.
The above points are obviously different from other reviewers Ye Hongsheng place. The reason probably lies in Ye Hongsheng for the martial arts have a special interest, and this hobby is very persistent, almost in the habit, even though he may have been included in some martial arts in addition to understanding the truth, but do not want to write about. The other reason is that Ye Hongsheng intends to maintain the comments of this "professional", as this is simply a stage for the reader to the book is very good. Many scholars, not the seemingly most in need of profound theoretical explanation, but Ye Hongsheng so extensive and illuminating introduction losing biased.
Therefore, the so-called "professional", which can be described as derogatory praise in half, but the word "simple" is a derogatory term, say some have more.
We all know, literature and jurisprudence of different creative and innovative is not in the strict sense. In Science, the proved a theorem, then the proof of the work is completed, then another way to prove someone else, meaning all fall short of a proof; in novels, the same subject matter and content, can have completely different performance style, the opposite artistic effect. Most of the time, how to write is more important than what to write multi-. But Ye Hongsheng have their own "simple" view, he wants to use similar methods to study and Confucianism in the martial arts, with particular emphasis on content and originality of the work, and ignore the creation, writing, reading and expressive values embodied. He describes himself in the argument, "I do not entirely agree with the nineteenth century Italian aesthetics Croce (B · Croce) the so-called 'art is lyrical intuition'; at least not so treated Fiction. But the beauty of personal experience indeed be 'intuitive' impact; so this argument can not help though, or more important than the subjective perception, the total to incorporate, compare, evidence, analysis of dharmas as an objective argument. '"In fact, he concluded, compared, evidence, analysis of these methods application, appears to lack depth of thought.
Ye Hongsheng's "simple", embodied in his simple, "Robin Hood" consciousness. "Swordfight" as in 1993, describes the old martial arts masters have some time to 平江不肖生, Huanzhulouzhu, house, white, Zheng card because, Wang Du Lu, the new number of times a Jin Yong, Sima Ling, Lung, Wo Lung Sheng , Mu Rongmei, Shangguan Ding and high-yung. Huang Yi then of course not known, but Ye Hongsheng reading range, not to be ignorant of Liang Yusheng, Wen Jui and Yat Siu and other writers, but he deliberately did not mention. Because he wanted to tell the reader implied that their level of fragmentation, as he listed those writers, there is no need to list. For instance, he said, "such as martial arts writer Sima Ling can be luck, devil's, such as Gu of 'innovative ideas', compared to flow in the shallow ignorance is bound, the Cologne and emitting body and non-repeatable The 'super new style', 'modernist' view of the lack of martial arts is more ", which means using a very blunt denial Wen Jui-creation. Look at his evaluation of Jin Yong, with the title and the title is not the same as others write, others are obvious compliment type the title, Jin Yong is with the implied derogatory "'Italian Job' is the non - - Comparison of Jin Yong's new, old "Eagle Shooting Heroes," ", saying that there is wrong, but the fact is that much, and with the ironic style, such as Jin Yong, said respected people," the parties touting the text, ranging from several Zhen 'myth' point "and" the general reader and general commentators "and" others, and without understanding "and" would not be enough if not so educated "and" blind worship ", he would" break the myth of Jin Yong " with most of the text discusses the works of Jin Yong, "Condor," How are flawed, even a lot of sarcastic language. In this way, obviously similar to the style of Jin Yong, the relatively low success fame Liang Yusheng, naturally there is no list of necessary. But on the contrary it, Ye Hongsheng on Taiwan's writers are very much appreciated the praise with a very straightforward way, as he said Sima Ling, "If its all for the ideas of depth, martial art original, not only with contemporary Hong Kong martial arts Zong Jiang Jin A strive for hegemony long newcomer to Taiwan 'new style' giant impact of Cologne in particular large. "
Speaking of Ye Hongsheng "Robin Hood" the root of consciousness is unlikely that he will not see Wen Jui, Liang Yusheng, who works in a number of obvious superior to others, and probably he would not speak. So many years on an active martial arts critics, naturally, and some writers have contacts, but we are familiar with, like more than anyone else who's a good topic to write, direct say on the poor, who do not boast who boast, also have a choice. Therefore have the following point, his comments on the writers lack the level of comparison.
Ye Hongsheng's "simple", embodied in the concept of an original reading, not from a higher position in the level of the martial arts to make the distinction between writers, so that readers have a certain misleading. The following quote is not very appropriate example.
In the martial arts when I first read, the first contact with the Liang Yusheng and Jin Yong, but one day, I saw Chen Qingyun's "Mingjianfengliu" Shangguan Ding also signed the "wind and thunder fan", see very quickly, and sleepless nights felt extremely good, compared to beam gold two of the more exciting to some, and later that Gu's "September eagle", that is even more interesting, not because we really see its benefits, but Some circumstances do not thoroughly understand subconsciously think to write as "profound", must be good, but also saw Wen Jui's "Divine Man", have been very appreciative. Then I look around there are some martial arts people, to exchange, but they did not see me, so I gave them speak, write, write good martial arts is not only Liang Yusheng and Jin, as well as many other writers, are also very good. At that time people think that I know more knowledgeable, but also followed a similar reading a lot of novels, but also really good. However, after that stage, we know that the view is wrong, kungfu novels should have a level of problems, but we all know that time can not, so read a lot of useless books. However, I feel that some, I will tell some young readers, what books should be read, what books did not see the need.
Ye Hongsheng the way of discussion, there is a certain indiscriminate means. Indeed, he cited those writers and works for the martial arts have some value, but still compete with the level of. Like to see South 7 separate the powers of the tactics of strange, very wonderful, but do not see how high their powers in the end, however, and the whole truth Seven more, there is a qualitative difference, and all the extraordinary true comparison of Seven and five parties, has been declining. Ye Hongsheng's comments, is like to let each of them exercises its own powers, generally do not understand people who may feel profound martial art and Han Xiaoying Sun Buer most powerful, and that is very misunderstood.
Here is not to say Ye Hongsheng lower levels of reading itself, but he put a lot of writers, works without mixing different forms of evaluation levels of readers, see the wood for the trees, we saw debris not see mountains, in the long run, is Some irresponsible. Ye Hongsheng's point of view, for those writers, who works on the martial arts market, are good, but the reader, not the benefits of nature. This seems to also involve commentator who is responsible, position it an objective problem, there are geographical and moral issues of prejudice and comments inside.
The above said, "Robin Hood", not completely, Ye Hongsheng not totally comparable, but his way of comparison, the conclusions are very problematic, so need to focus here.
As you know, practicing martial arts master is not the same, the same powers, practice varies widely in different people, but Ye Hongsheng discussion of the difference is that the master key is what martial arts training, rather than the level of cultivation. For instance, he discusses the Sima Ling Jin Yong are brilliant even than Gu, Sima Ling's martial art system generally say both tactics, but also pay attention to the momentum, but the focus is a bit of ancient gold, so gold is an ancient, only Si Maling is 2, 2 large double than the one. Ye Hongsheng's comments, the works reflect the culture dragon, human caring, artistic value of high-level mention, they simply made a big fuss in the minutiae. Read the following passage:
This argument should not give rise to Quanzhen under the laughing and crying on the Jin Yong was, it touches on the points give the impression Ye Hongsheng much biases, for each of the distinction between qualified talent, choose only the theory of teaching, the lack of the most basic understanding. Indeed a cast doubt on this, for he is a true martial arts can not distinguish between family level, really is that he can not see the level of expression of the state. You may find it here on Ye Hongsheng duties too far, but if look at Ye Hongsheng's "on hold all cases" will be comprehended.
This list is just Ye Hongsheng's discourse on the part of martial art, and other small flaws on the plot also listed a lot, taking up half the article length, and sent, there are no typos of. Typically, such a discourse is often used to entertain general readers, and very few to deny the creation of Jin Yong, a number of professional critics will not use. Such as Ye Hongsheng micromanager singled out, but with the seriousness of the blocks of text to be cited, it is very Xiasheng comments practices, educated readers watched, in addition to admire Ye "martial art" of the profound, the nor will find it very funny to avoid. Even too far is that Ye Hongsheng criticism "Condor", display the arguments, the list of "flaws" are mostly from the old "Condor", which people can not be fully accepted. He is over at that time, read the old version and found some problems, they insisted to today's readers to "catch-up" other people "and more, according to new 'set of Jin Yong's works' (as amended) to overestimate the achievements of Jin Yong's Novels "Therefore, he wants to clarify a misunderstanding, the implication is quite exposed Jin Yong's" true colors "of the mean. Is Jin Yong revised his work, the performance is not a skill not a home? Does the reader to read the old version still works to "do not overestimate the" Jin Yong's works it? It can not help but think that Leaf is "the crime even more, and hang it" the.
In addition, Ye Hongsheng the treatment of different writers, discusses the ways and get very different conclusions, Jin Yong, who he so harsh, but had great tolerance for others, and somewhere in the market assert that the description of a work than described by Jin Yong somewhere more exciting and so on. Sima Ling praise he has reached more than "Jinyong Mi" Praise the point of Jin Yong's more exaggerated, "really amazing, such as" (the powers of description to describe Sima Ling), such as "dexterous writing skills, innovation, few attain perfect realm , the novel art of firmness and flexibility, has been antagonistic carry on with Jin Yong "," style, layout, structure and martial art intended to override state and even Jin Yong, Gu Long, Liang Yu-Shen of the following more not carry on, "" How can Jin Yong, Gu Long novels have such understanding and knowledge? "," Sima Ling-end fine art of fiction, non-Xun than others, "and so on; also accused of Jin Yong," "Eagle Shooting Heroes" shape of the 'great swordsman' Guo Jing apparent stupidity , kind-hearted, almost no conflict to speak of human nature, but 'stupid' to that other point, how can we attend penetrate superior martial arts? "and also accused of Gu Long's" new style "text, asserted Gu Long Wu Daosi think Mr Eiichi Yoshikawa rule may only fur, and Sima Ling is "non-Yoshikawa clinics." Another example, he said Gu Long's phrase "to a considerable extent, undermined the Arts and Culture and Gas, if broken, if continued, is stunned when the students a sense. This is exactly the Gu Long novels are still not achieve the 'scenes and the' state of the main cause. ", said he had not completely unreasonable, but to discuss Mu Rongmei time came a big change in his best praise and feared the. See the following text:
-
Bang! 19th ring.
Bang! Article ring.
Night Feng Xiaoxiao, as if everyone is shaking.
Clang - "Chuang Bang!"
Ah! Ah! An amazing sound, one after another.
-
Ye Hongsheng commented, "This kind of 'new style' section, who can complain?" Strictly speaking, this has not commented on, is that you become as you say you will not do you not a "thesis."
-
Yellow as gold over and over cauliflower passed in April.
Liuhua sweltering bright red in May passed.
Pitt's June garden fragrance sparse passed.
Mid-autumn maple leaves infected in early July has passed.
Now is the Tan Kwai fragrance of August.
-
Of the Mu Rongmei of this text, at least in a separate opinion, do not see any particularly good places, but Ye Hongsheng's thesis is this: "The above quotation is not such a section if the two develop together; another language if the set of popular fiction Xiyong - the so-called 'have something to say is long, no words are short', so why not have a very boring! Mu Rongmei from this I realized that the 'new' solid is different from Cologne the 'new', and its narrative style is the beauty of Wolong, Zhuge , Sima, etc. 'Sanjian' above. fault not his children, tender and slightly worse than described martial arts play, they may speak out to avoid its Yong will! "
Moreover, Ye Hongsheng praise Sima Ling "was a slut Yinwa also when the world must", "The Magic Pen Yan Qi, Live Flesh, this has Jin Yong, Gu Long generation of the less" argument that "this is a kind of realistic pen and ink, as long as calibrate. it harmless. if deliberately evading, anti-due 'a phase' and drop by. "impression that their argument is very strange, I am afraid that no one else down the" Xia Sheng ", it touches on his own impropriety of the remarks.
From the above we may have seen the text, and Ye Hongsheng discussed in the "simple", also in the irrational, awkward conclusion, while some of its peculiar point of absurdity, has reached ridiculous proportions.
Finally, It is curious that, Ye Hongsheng's Postscript in the readme said, "Guban Sheng Cao Gu, written essay, Ya-Wen, critics, political commentators numerous; who had no time like the old order be, a new chapter in the reproduction of destroying established , to physically and mentally exhausted by a few. The only reason is nothing more than high self-demands, and strive to 'innovation, scale new heights' it. But to do this eight characters, but also easier said than done! "
On this passage, the reader free experience. Since that fair, Ye Hongsheng's efforts and achievements worthy of respect, but he spent two years time, read so many martial arts, and finally get such a "swordfight" summary, there are such high self-evaluation It is sad that people think, not only for his "professional" and "simple" is the position for the martial arts themselves: Ye Hongsheng become a martial arts study if the "leading authority" figure, martial arts am afraid that it was have ability and insight of scholars ignored.
Translated by Google