prose in the classical literary style : literary and artistic creation : comparative philology > do not seek to understand things thoroughly
Contents
Superficial understanding
不求甚解
不求甚解
不求甚解
  Explanation: Just to know a ballpark, not to do a thorough understanding. Often refers to learning or research is not serious, not depth.
  Usage: Verb-object type; as predicate, attributive, adverbial; negative, suggesting people do not study in depth
  Source: Jin Tao Qian's "Drifting": "No Muli, good reading, without understanding, for every knowing, we are pleased to forget the food."
  Examples: Learning scientific and cultural knowledge would dig depth understanding, not careless, ~.
  Riddle: Date
No. 2
  Understand the effect that reading only, not for precise understanding of words. Do not understand is that doing things Taitailielie, careless.
Translated by Google
bù qiú shèn jiě
不求甚解 bù qiú shèn jiě
  Originally referred to the book just to understand the essence, do not focus on a single word of explanation, no derogatory
Translated by Google
No. 4
  Good reading, careless. - Jin Tao, "Drifting"
Translated by Google
No. 5
  Now means do not study more seriously, do not seek in-depth understanding; also means no in-depth understanding of the situation
Translated by Google
No. 6
不求甚解
  Jin Tao Qian's "Drifting": "not Muli, good reading, without understanding, for every knowing, is pleased to forget the food." Means reading just to understand the gist, not deliberate effort spent in the words. That the treatment of this multi-study, work seriously and do not seek in-depth understanding. Qu "Luantan Little Zhuge": "He has recognized thousands of Chinese characters, but it is superficial understanding of." Mao Zedong "" Agrarian Investigation> Preamble and Postscript ":" Now many of our comrades, but also preserved a kind of sloppy, careless style. "
Translated by Google
No. 7
  Very: very, very. Just to know that one probably does not seek a thorough understanding. Usually refers to learning or research is not serious, not depth.
Translated by Google
Teaching plan
  Topic: "superficial understanding" Deng Tuo
  (Basic Edition) Volume I
  Topic: "superficial understanding" Deng Tuo literary essays
  Objectives: To understand the "superficial understanding" of the meaning of Tao Yuanming raised serious experience in the text of the proposition put forward.
  Teaching focus: Taste the text of the key words "knowingly", "front through," "to understand the effect" and "watch his rough" and so on.
  Teaching difficult: on reading this question is completely read first thought, and then focus on "seeking Shen Jie" and "superficial understanding" of the main discussions.
  Teaching methods: discussion method, reading method.
  (A) over the old
  "Huai Lu Xun" and "chance encounter on a train" with the write prose, where the difference in the sentence, expression, writing features?
  (B) About the Author
  Deng Tuo (1912-1966), formerly known as Deng Zijian, aka Yun Deng special, Fujian, a famous contemporary ideological theorist and essayist. Early 1960s, with "Manan village" pseudonym, created a number of fascinating, inspiring essays, most notably "Yanshanyehua." "Cultural Revolution", suffered brutal persecution, on May 18, 1966 wrongfully died.
  "Superficial understanding" Yes "Yanshanyehua" of a masterpiece.
  (C) clarify the structure
  1, there were a few paragraphs of this article? Find the center of each paragraph of the sentence.
  2 What is the central argument of this paper is? Somewhere in the text appear in?
  3, familiar with the first paragraph, asked to recite. Thinking:
  A, "in fact, not necessarily" in the "natural" refers to what? "Not really," What does it mean?
  B, do not have to advocate is superficial understanding of what?
  C, not blindly opposed without understanding what they are?
  4, how to understand the Tao Yuanming "good reading, without understanding; each has a knowing, they readily forget food"?
  5, "three works on mastery, independence and bright view of its rough" and watch their meaning roughly what
  Thinking?
  6, "Reading and mediocre read, at dawn and not let go, do not be too sluggish," flat reading, and did not let go at dawn What does it mean?
  7, try combining pottery, Zhuge, Lu Xiangshan three ancient words to talk about some of their own experience in the study of.
  Clear:
  Superficial understanding: a phrase from Jin Tao Yuanming, "Drifting." Originally referred to the school just to understand the gist, do not spend too much effort on the words. Now more than that to learn or work is not serious and does not seek a deep understanding, kick the tires. Containing derogatory.
  Sentence:
  We read the book of Marxism-Leninism, Mao read books, to study hard, practice, in-depth understanding, not ~
  The first paragraph:
  "Ran" means "on any question without understanding are bad." "Not really" means is not entirely so, it can not be so absolute, that is not the words of death. "Do not promote" a superficial understanding means learning not serious and does not seek in-depth understanding can not "blindly oppose" a superficial understanding refers just to understand the essence, do not spend too much effort on the words.
  Central argument:
  Important book to be read is often repeated, every read will feel Good Books. That repeatedly, humbly understand. (In the end of the article)
  Good Books: Open the book to read will benefit from it.
  The following describes the intention of Tao, one cited the text of the original, evidence; second is to conduct a comprehensive citation dialectic.
  A, "certainly better than reading, this has at least say."
  B, "read the tips is all about knowing" and not "all of a sudden want to completely read all the books."
  C, Tao Yuanming style "superficial understanding" has two meanings: one is open-minded, Caution "ego"; Second, through the front and rear, Caution "stubborn."
  Concept which roughly means "dead pull a single word, not runs the risk of a local not give up the whole." Flat reading at dawn and not let meant "runs the risk," and is similar formulation without understanding.
  Article is divided into three parts:
  Part I: ask questions, first mentioned and now people on the "superficial understanding" the ancient meaning of negation, with "any question" that belongs to look at the issue of this absolute negation.
  Part II: analysis of the problem, explained the positive intention of Tao.
  Part III: solve problems, not just to remember some further emphasize the words of "Shen Jie," and to "live" reading, to understand the "spiritual essence."
  (D) repeating aloud
  Required to recite ancient statement three references, understand the meaning.
  (Five) class discussion
  Combined with the actual situation, to talk about some of their own experience in school learning. To speak freely, to discuss,
  Teachers summary.
Translated by Google
Explanation
  [As]
  Not seek to understand things thoroughly
  [Fallible]
  Find the solution is not careful
  [Pronunciation]
  bù qiú shèn jiě
  Definition
  Very: too; such as "go too far." Solution: Learn and understand. Intention is only to understand the spirit of reading, spend more effort on not a single word of explanation, only understand the essence of the article. Now more that learning is not serious, does not refer to a deep understanding or not understanding the situation.
  [Source]
  Jin Tao Qian "Drifting": "Do not believe in fame, good reading, without understanding, knowing each has, he is pleased to forget the food."
  [Example]
  To learn assiduously scientific and cultural knowledge, in-depth understanding, not sloppy.
  [Listen]
  In the study, we have to understand thoroughly, not superficial understanding.
  [Synonyms]
  Gulping, kick the tires, pedantic
  [Antonyms]
  Poor actually the original committee, quibble, get to the bottom
  Grammar
  Verb-object; as predicate, attribute, adverbial; containing derogatory, means a person who is not in-depth study
Translated by Google
Text
不求甚解 课文
  Most people often think of any problems without understanding are bad. In fact, not all. Although we do not advocate superficial understanding attitude, however, opposed to blindly without understanding the same attitude no good reason.
  Tao Yuanming
  This sentence was first superficial understanding of Tao said. In his "Drifting" wrote the essay: "Good reading, without understanding; each has a knowing, they readily forgot to eat." People tend to just grab before he said a word, but lost after he said In short, therefore, the study of Tao Yuanming attitude is very satisfied, which is why he come from? He said that after two sentences are closely linked, interactive clarify meaning is very clear. This is the correct attitude to study the ancients, we should learn, he should be completely indiscriminate violent unreasonable criticism.
  It should be acknowledged that good reading habits is very important. If you do not read or do not like reading, then, regardless of what to say or ask Shen Jie are meaningless without understanding it. Because they do not understand what knowledge do not read, do not like to read the book will not be hard to understand the truth. Certainly better than reading, this has at least say. Truly the chance to read into it, the more interested in reading more, the book will naturally get to know the truth. All of a sudden want to completely read all the books, especially important to fully understand the classics, except that arrogant man, who did not dare so confident. The reading tips, all about knowing. For this, Tao Yuanming particularly insightful. So, he encounters the real knowing when to delight even have to forget to eat.
  In this light, Tao Yuanming advocate reading to knowing, and knowing the real and very easy, so I had to say without understanding it. Without understanding the meaning of these four words can be seen, there are two: First, said humbly, not aimed admonish conceited scholar to understand why the first reading of the book, in fact, may not really understand the true meaning of the book had, honestly admit only superficial understanding as well. Second reading of the description of the method, not stubborn little quibble, but to front through, to understand the effect. This two meanings are very important and we need to appreciate.
  Lenin had repeatedly criticized Plekhanov, said he thought familiar with the writings of Marx, but Marx's writings was actually done a lot of misinterpretation. For us today, the Marxist-Leninist classics, it should adopt an open mind, must not have read it to understand that, in fact, do not know where yet plenty Mile! To read through the classics, know where truth and correctly used to guide our work, but also must continue to strive to learn. To learn well, you can not die reading, but must live reading, say, can not remember the classics just some of the words, but must understand the essence of the classics.
  In this regard, the ancients did have many successful experiences. Zhuge Liang is one such study. According to Wang Can "heroic mind money," said Zhuge Liang and Xu Shu, SHI Guang Yuan, Menggong Wei et al a study tour to study, "three works on mastery, independence and bright view of its rough." It seems to be much more clever than wise indeed Xu Shu et al, because of its rough concept, often more extensive knowledge, understand the issues more fully.
  Of course, this is not to say, reading can be so-so, very seriously. Definitely should not be the case. Its roughly the same concept requires careful reading, just to pull a single word immortality, not runs the risk of a partial and not give up a whole.
  Xiangshan Lu Song Dynasty Quotations, said: "Reading and mediocre read, at dawn and not let go, do not be too sluggish." It is also not lose the greater meaning. Called at dawn and did not let go, and superficial understanding of the formulation is very similar. Let is temporary, it will eventually understand its meaning.
  Experience has shown that there do not know how many books read through twice, three times, four times to know how to read a;, or read a book in front of a lot of places do not understand, read behind it suddenly through; others do not see the book yesterday understand, only know how to look at ourselves to give; while others seem to have read, and in fact not understand, and later with some practical knowledge, truly understand what it means. Therefore, it is important to read the book to be often repeated, every read will feel Good Books.
Translated by Google
Allusion
  Tao Yuanming was eighteen years old himself wrote an article called "Drifting." Tao Yuanming beginning of the article is this: Mr. do not know where people do not know his name. His next five residential willow trees, and thus on the "five willow" as their number. Mr. favorite quiet, and located not say much, nor envy Rong Hua Lilu. Love reading, like a book to read is not obsessed with words of explanation; whenever the significance of the book have some experience, it will happily forget to eat. Drinking raw sex, but because of poverty at home, you can not always get the drink. Relatives and friends know my situation, so when standing invited me to drink wine. And I do, go there they always drink light equipment.
  Usage as predicate, attribute, adverbial; means people do not study in depth
  Sentence: We learn to know what he meant, meaning, how to write, not superficial understanding.
Translated by Google
Data
  Lu Xun's "superficial understanding" (pseudo-freedom book)
  Articles must be annotated, in particular the World dignitaries article. Some writers do their own article also notes themselves, find it very troublesome. As the world's dignitaries would not, they are plenty secretary, or private school of disciples, for the work they do comment. However, There is another article, but it may not be in a comment.
  For example, the world's first VIP U.S. president issued a "peace" of the Declaration [1], is said to prohibit national armed forces beyond national borders. However, commentators immediately say:
  "As for the United States to garrison payed China, for the treaty, it is not within the proposed prohibition of President Roosevelt," [2] (16 Reuters, Washington). Look at the original Roche: "The countries should participate in a solemn and just does not infringe the Convention, and re-declare their solemn obligation limitation and reduction of armaments of, and in the signing countries to faithfully fulfill its obligations, each undertakes not to send any nature The armed forces beyond national borders. "
  If serious comment up, this is actually saying: Those who do not "exactly" no "solemn", not "undertake their own" countries, he can send troops beyond the borders of any nature. At least, Chinese people wait a minute pleased, according to this interpretation, beyond the borders of the Japanese army on the grounds or full; Moreover, even America's own troops stationed in China, has long statement was "not in this case," the. However, this was undoubtedly a serious note disappointed.
  Furthermore, like "national disgrace refusing to sign the treaty," [3] a verse, has long been a lot of passing note. Chuan said: "Japan compromise, and now no one outspoken, and no one dared to row."
  Here, the main thing is a "dare" word. But: the signing of treaties were afraid to dare, this is something people take the pen, but people have no need to take the gun and did not dare to dare to study the issue of embarrassment - shorten defense, lure the enemy in depth like the strategy is need not signed. Who is to take the pen would not have signed, if so, would be too low to be able to. So there is one, said that the "side of the negotiations." Ever since commentaries came: "to those who do not recognize is the responsibility of the third party, with the unreasonable approach to oral representations ...... liquidate unprofitable Japanese." This is a news agency Dentsu in Japan [4]. This leak secret is very nasty comments, so this is not not the Japanese "disinformation."
  In short, these articles chaotic one, is not the most wonderful comments, especially the kind of spoils or nasty comments.
  Tao Yuanming childhood reading talked about the "good reading without understanding" [5], sir give me speak, he said: "superficial understanding" who just do not see the comments, and read only the meaning of this article. Comment Although, some people do not want us to see for sure.
  May 18.
  [1] Declaration on "peaceful" means the May 16, 1933 U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the world published forty-four heads of state, "the manifesto calls on world peace and security", its main content is appealed to countries to reduce armaments and To stop armed troops crossed the border.
  [2] "As for the United States to garrison in China" and other words, when Roosevelt issued a declaration, the U.S. government for their Unmanning China, acts in violation of this Declaration in defense said.
  [3] "refusing to sign the treaty disgrace" See page 134 of this volume injection [4]. "On the day of compromise, and now no one outspoken, and no one dares line" is May 17, 1933 in Tianjin, Huang Fu talk to reporters.
  [4] news agency Dentsu Dentsu agency that Nippon Telegraph news agency, founded in Tokyo in 1901, 1936 and merged into alliance Yonhap news agency. Power Newswire nine hundred and twenty ○ _set_ up the commune in Shanghai, China. This text message is: "Tokyo Electric powered 17: Negotiations on the terms of the armistice of the Chinese problem, the Japanese central part of the intention of the following, although the intelligence to negotiate a truce, and then the first line of its sincerity suspicious Chinese army, yet stubbornly continues. challenge, north military authorities, and even decisive command issued to resist. truce by those responsible for the military to really negotiate dignified method, if not recognized as a liability by a third party who, by unreasonable approach to oral representations, This gentle, but the Japanese are seeking temporary Fengrui it. Chinese authorities, philosophical trend in East Asia, the Japanese liquidation useless, are its imperative, therefore must first actual show sincerity. "(according to May 17, 1933" Big Evening ")
  [5] "good reading without understanding" language, see Tao "Drifting": "Good reading without understanding, for every knowing, they readily forget the food."
Translated by Google
Idiom Dictionary
  Idiom name without understanding Pinyin bù qiú shèn jiě very idiom interpretation: Very, very. Just to know about, do not seek a thorough understanding. Often refers not serious study or research, is not deep. Idiom Jin Tao Qian's "Drifting": "no Muli, good reading, without understanding, knowing each has pleased forgot to eat." Use sentence this man was young, everything idling han Han, superficial understanding.
  ★ Qing Li Baojia "Bureaucrats" fifty-fourth back
Translated by Google
English Expression
  1. n.:  do not seek to understand things thoroughly,  have but little knowledge (understanding) of
  2. v.:  not seek to understand things thoroughly,  be content with superficial understanding
French Expression
  1. v.  refuser d'aller au fond des choses, ne pas se donner la peine d'approfondir la chose, se contenter de comprendre aux trois quarts, ne pas chercher à approfondir
Thesaurus
swallow a date whole, glimpses of the truth, Minor success Opinion, The half-comprehended, smatter, How, the other, smattering
Antonym
Pursuit ray tracing, run to ground, Digging to find the source of the, dig Make a thorough investigation of basio-, an inquiring (turn of) mind, plate Make a thorough investigation of basio-, one takes on the color of his company, Heard eyes see, Seeing heard, hear of (about) witness, Hear of (about) See for oneself, Browse project heard, Sougentichi, insist on getting to the bottom of sth., Smash Terrine ask ever
Containing Phrases
book do not seek to understand things thoroughly