|
|
|
| 现代诗歌 | | 落尘诗社 | | 西方文学 Western Literature |
 
|
| 博弈 ?2011-10-30 07:36:41?? |  |
About Life
The philosophy developed ever since Plato resulted in logic and science,
which are the ultimate achievements of such endeavors.
On the other hand, schools focus on humanity and harmony with the world
such as Buddhism and Dao-ism or Zen for that matter, may be the ultimate
achievers, and they are to be analyzed and inspected by modern methods
such as logic and science. A super-set is being enhanced by a subset.
|
| 博弈 ?2011-11-05 06:38:33?? | |
Learning Languages
We don't think in language, we express, analyze, communicate in language.
The fact that we (humans) can learn a language is the best argument that we don't think in language.
|
| 博弈 ?2011-11-17 11:08:12?? | |
1. Science is to study the behavior of things, their norms that can be reproduced within
time and space dimensions.
Science is not to investigate the essence of things, when it tries to grasp those,
it runs the risk of violating humanity.
The Dao-ism school of thought seeks to follow the balance of humanity and the world of things.
It is not anti-science, it is in fact scientific in methodology, seeking the norm behavior of the nature.
2. Scientific method is the practice of most objectivity, though not absolute, within subjectivity.
|
| 博弈 ?2012-01-30 15:20:44?? | |
Saying "Gott ist tot" is meaningless.
Here is why
The phrase shows at one time Gott existed alive, now dead;
dead or alive, it's admitting "Gott" exists.
The concept Gott never dies is a direct conflict with the phrase.
If "Gott ist tot", you will not be able to talk about it,
you are able to talk about it because either it does not
exist or it is alive, either one contradicts with the phrase.
|
| 博弈 ?2012-02-02 07:11:48?? | |
About 神 and God
The word God is commonly translated as ‘神’ in Chinese, this is incorrect strictly speaking.
Prior to the introduction of God into the Chinese civilizations, 神 has different meanings, sometimes completely opposite to the concept of God.
|
| 博弈 ?2012-02-13 22:48:30?? | |
God isn’t a philosophical question (though it appeared so since the so-called “Christian Age” in the Western tradition), but a religious quest. God exists in a religion, or plural forms. Using science or philosophy or other disciplines such as epistemology to analyze the concept of God is irrelevant; in short, philosophy should not attempt to address God, which is beyond languages.
|
| Lake ?2012-02-14 07:17:38?? | |
R.H. Blyth sees the divide between East and West as epitomized in the Buddhist and Christian religions, "the Buddha in eternal peace and the Christ in eternal agony..."
|
| 博弈 ?2012-02-14 13:56:31?? | |
Lake所引述的是有些道理的。
"一切西方認為具有普世價值的，在東方的文明的眼裡都有帝國主義的傾向，包括宗教。＂
我認識的有位台灣的教授如是說。
The West is also learning from the East and through it you may see how they view the East.
I think the future philosophy is on the way of "integration of division."
If you have netflix account, this is a good documentary to watch:
Legacy: The Origins of Civilization
1991
(Historian Michael Wood's documentary series travels the globe to trace the origins of the tools and lifestyles that led to organized civilization. Wood visits the sites of the world's first cities, as well as early empires such as India and China.)
|
| 博弈 ?2012-02-16 07:39:15?? | |
Knowledge is learned, except instincts.
This applies to morals, cultures and languages, too.
What is learned can be embedded over time; the memory is embedded in its structure.
Instincts are beyond reason; they come with an entity, like "presence."
本能外，所有的知識是經由學習而來的。
這也適用於道德，文化和語言。
那知識在經過一段長期的浸淫（時間）後有可能成為整體中的一個固定部分，記憶被植入結構之中。
本能越過理性，本能是一個無意識存在。
|
| 博弈 ?2012-03-02 23:34:39?? | |
God or Gods is experienced, not to (and cannot) be pursued as a belief. Religion is man-made after all. When people practice religion such as reading religious text, going to churches, temples, praying, meditation etc., they pursue. The genuine encounter of God (the Experience) does not come this way. For those did experience the Experience, they can’t explain it in language, they don’t need a religion but they sure do have belief afterwards.
However, the artificial religious activities serve the social and moral purposes at least, or political purpose at the most.
|
| 后页 [1]2[3] 前页 | | 评论鉴赏 Reviews | | 名家综述 Expert Review | | Chinese Poetry | | 网友论坛 | | 古韵新音 | | 散文诗 Poetry in Prose | | 散文游记 | | 影视频道 | | 宾至如归 | | 美哉贴图 | | 小说故事 | | Reviews, Critics and Criticism | | English Poetry | | 海外新闻 Oversea News | | 博弈 | | 洛夫專欄 Lo Fu's Poetry Column | | 开心一笑 |
|
