博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-01 16:56:47 发表主题: The forgiving wood |
|
|
饒木
核桃鉗收緊的時候
猴子在枝子
吱吱叫
樹上
落下許多淚
而木魚游入
和尚突然開竅
放下小槌
耳朵向外大喊:
我看見‘破’了
The forgiving wood
Nutcracker tightening
chattering up and down
monkeys on the branches
Off the tree
leaves fall in
to tears
the wooden fish
swims in
The monk sud
denly comes to
stick held down
His ears shout out:
I saw it, the 'break'
The nut opens _________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
Lake 举人
注册时间: 2007-01-09 帖子: 1286
Lake北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-02 18:16:20 发表主题: |
|
|
禅诗?
引用: |
Off the tree
leaves fall in
to tears
the wooden fish
swims in
The monk sud
denly comes to
stick held down |
断行把单字都“破”开了,又没加连字号,读得好辛苦。 _________________ the trouble with poetry is that it encourages the writing of more poetry -- Billy Collins |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-02 18:30:41 发表主题: |
|
|
哈哈. 不然怎麼叫"饒", 第一遍肯定不行的.
不饒不破.
自己說
若食堯, 則析木(玩析字詩解). 核桃肉像腦的組織, 堯字也像腦的組織(腦隨向下延).
核桃戴緊箍兒, 樹葉如淚, 悟空又對等木魚形上, 木字析成, 入上下大小.
木魚為聲游入葉淚成河. 尾段頭殼即木魚. 有較新的提喻, 通感隱喻修辭運用.
前晚寫了個雙語版, 則在猴與僧(monkey and monk)上著力,
亦在瘋與堅果(nut and nuts)上隱喻. 借第二語言解詩一類.
"stick held down", 也有放下堅持的隱喻. _________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
Lake 举人
注册时间: 2007-01-09 帖子: 1286
Lake北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-03 09:22:24 发表主题: |
|
|
这类诗的读者群是谁?sureal?
不过以析字写诗倒是写出了新意,破了旧框框。不知是否知音难求? _________________ the trouble with poetry is that it encourages the writing of more poetry -- Billy Collins |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-03 13:29:19 发表主题: |
|
|
喝, 博弈寫詩哪管讀者?
_________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
Lake 举人
注册时间: 2007-01-09 帖子: 1286
Lake北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-03 13:40:09 发表主题: |
|
|
曲高和寡。自己找乐子。 _________________ the trouble with poetry is that it encourages the writing of more poetry -- Billy Collins |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-03 14:05:24 发表主题: |
|
|
其實. 不高, 有進入障礙是真的, 但這障礙是過去的詩造成的, 不是我造成的.
讀詩的人心中已經有詩的拘束, 不自由了, 所以有障礙, 讀到不同的東西就難進入了.
讀者要讀每一篇詩都像是人生第一次讀詩一般, 那就容易進入想像的空間.
這個論點我以前提過. 當時即筆, 大致原則還是不離的.
引用: |
本文
在我眼中,是么是好诗?这个问题人言人殊,但似又殊途同归。[1][2][3]
旅途即笔。(会不会太短?Very Happy 以参与的精神简论 )
注
[1] 诗的零架构
这是一个我比较喜欢的观点,零可以大爆炸,可以建构,可以归零。
诗的零架构,简单来说就是诗文本身定义了诗的结构与形式。诗的
结构有时是历时而形成的韵文诗,适合唱和的谣、词,或无韵的精美散文,
或解构后的口语化的诗,个人创作的诗法诗,等等。界定的范围若以法律
来比喻,好像国际法,国家法,地方法,个人法,约定俗成的而各自遵守
在所定义的范围内。诗内的每一个字,词,句,段有二度语言或更高的
相互联系关系。循此,任何一首诗,或诗别都可以解析或再开发。
[2] 架构里所承载的东西
架构里所承载的东西是思想,是感情,是歌颂,叙事等等,每一个字,词,
句,段对于共存于一诗的缘分,起了纯化,美化的联想,这个缘分的结合并对
所赋予的思想,感情,歌颂,等等产生大于各自字,词,句,段所涵盖的意义。
[3] 何谓好诗
字词的音调,色调,形象,意象起了和谐的搭配,且文字内在的交谈产生
更丰富的内涵就是好诗。罗兰?巴特的五个语码(选择语码、意素语码、
文化语码、阐释语码、象征语码)不失为解读新诗的一个起点。这样的
后设解读,是无法完全抓住写作者的本意,只能不断的拟近,但读者的
介入,使诗文有了开放的意义。
具体例子
All Souls' Night by W.B. Yeats
Midnight has come and the great Christ Church bell
And many a lesser bell sound through the room;
And it is All Souls' Night.
And two long glasses brimmed with muscatel
Bubble upon the table. A ghost may come;
For it is a ghost's right,
His element is so fine
Being sharpened by his death,
To drink from the wine-breath
While our gross palates drink from the whole wine.
但这里只提第一段,这十段都有一个相同的‘形式’,1,2,4,5,10行都是较长的。
第一段 1,2 如钟声的 重音,头尾两行如墙;室内有酒,有钟声。
这第一个 stanza (like a room) 定义了以下所有段落的形式,有形式喻在内。
又,段的韵式,(1,2) 和 (4,5) ,(3)和(6)。(7)和(10),(8)和(9)行是押的。
我把这一段加上了颜色,方便看;余段类似,各室(stanza)定各韵。
这一首诗,虽未守传统的韵式,却涵盖了上所提的每一个因素,故是好诗。
当然,不必完全符合也可能是好诗。 |
_________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-03 22:52:14 发表主题: |
|
|
As to English poetry, the above views coincide with professor of poetry
Michael Schmidt at U. of Glasgow, UK. I am reading some of his edited books,
good to find out some feel the same. So, I am not alone.
Extracted
"No good poem makes common sense; the essence of a good poem is
the uncommonness of the sense it makes. It is a structuring of words in which many meanings,
or meanings at many levels are enacted."
"You should open to these poems with no preconceptions and be open to enjoyment they can bring" (referring to the 20th century poetry, in the book
"The Great Modern Poets in their own words")
Going back to my old view, a poem is unique, can't be
copied, imitated, taught. _________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
Lake 举人
注册时间: 2007-01-09 帖子: 1286
Lake北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 07:30:31 发表主题: |
|
|
I wish I could put your thinking cap on when writing. I mean it!
To clarify, I was not saying this poem is not good, I was saying it's not easy to understand. Maybe it is just me because I don't see other people jump in to comment, assuming the difficulty of understanding is not their problem at all.
"the uncommonness of the sense it makes" - I like it. A good poem still makes sense, but just the uncommonness of the sense. Or does a poem have to make any sense??? Still thinking...Thanks for the Extracted.
PS: Honestly, I find your explanation is more interesting to read.
PPS: Any writing that I could not come up with is unique in my eye, regardless if I like it or not.
PPPS: What is a good poem? Just an example: a first prize poem in a poetry competition judged by a so called poet with credentials is but trite, tasteless to others' eyes. That's very interesting.
End:Lao-tzu said "He who knows does not speak". Obviously, I don't know nothing.
_________________ the trouble with poetry is that it encourages the writing of more poetry -- Billy Collins |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 08:08:34 发表主题: |
|
|
Internet somehow developed a very different view on how a poem be like,
we should once a while return to people in teachings of this practice and
critics; we can verify thoughts there, though not obligated
This poem is unique, good or bad? I don't care.
But, thanks for your comment, indeed. _________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
Lake 举人
注册时间: 2007-01-09 帖子: 1286
Lake北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 08:29:40 发表主题: |
|
|
I once joined a workshop and was asked to write nonsense. I simply could not come up with anything. A loser!
I borrowed a book entitled "Poets Teaching Poets" a year ago, but haven't finished one fourth of it yet. _________________ the trouble with poetry is that it encourages the writing of more poetry -- Billy Collins |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 14:30:41 发表主题: |
|
|
其实,析字只是诗中极小的一小部分,为的是添加乐趣(正如子子枝枝也是读趣,有没有含义呢?随读者去),
这诗的内容上的特点是喻的流转(核桃,木鱼,头壳),象的交相涉。析字是汉字的特色,将这个诗法运用到别的文字是新鲜的,
需要时机的(不是每个字能作的)。带了钥匙的和尚是猴子?(monkey) 写这诗的初想并不冀望读者会由
我说的方向先切入,那个的需要一段时间。但我的回复故意回些细微不易为人注意的。大的方向,由读者自己抓。
Or ,
why do I break the words 'into' and 'suddenly'?
If one wants, one can also elaborate on fall (then why does it fall, what falls after that)
the 'in' state and the 'to' state, a fall, a sudden, a wake-up call; a stick, an awakening, etc.
e.g., fall in love
fall - pass suddenly and passively into a state of body or mind;
I ought to put a closure my self diagnosis of the poem, but this is only 佛 some who may wonder. _________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
William Zhou周道模 探花
注册时间: 2007-06-10 帖子: 3950 来自: 中国四川广汉 William Zhou周道模北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 17:34:17 发表主题: |
|
|
学习两位有趣和深入的探讨、交流!春天的问候! _________________ 诗歌是灵魂的歌唱.
周道模 |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 21:11:43 发表主题: |
|
|
William 好,
如果熟悉Robert Frost 的那两首名诗,含 wood(s) 的,
我这英文版的则是意东方式的和诗,wood (树林,森林)的回应,
wood(s) (树林,木鱼槌)即在手中。告诉他如何破林而出。
可知如何破林而出?不妨回头细读Robert Frost诗的解析,找线索。
我有那两首诗的Robert Frost的原音,可惜这里无法贴。
(The Road Not Taken,Stopping By Woods on a Snowy Evening ) _________________ (在不斷的審醜裡終將建立起新的審美) |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
博弈 榜眼
注册时间: 2006-12-21 帖子: 4381 来自: SFO 博弈北美枫文集 |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
William Zhou周道模 探花
注册时间: 2007-06-10 帖子: 3950 来自: 中国四川广汉 William Zhou周道模北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-04-04 23:21:35 发表主题: |
|
|
谢谢!他的那首名诗读过,也读过有关评论,象征、多解。网址点不开啊? _________________ 诗歌是灵魂的歌唱.
周道模 |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
Lake 举人
注册时间: 2007-01-09 帖子: 1286
Lake北美枫文集 |
发表于: 2011-07-31 12:52:27 发表主题: |
|
|
刚读了一篇朋友介绍的文章,真的很好。讲的是Thomas 和 Frost 之间的友谊,其中提到 "Two Roads" (后改名为"The Road Not Taken") 对Thomas 最后从军上战场的影响。 文章提到两位对诗歌的共同看法。 有趣的是, 同一首诗歌, 作者写此的初衷,大众读者的理解以及Thomas (诗是写给他的)的解读是多么的不同。 引录几断,给有兴趣读全文的提供了一个链解 (友情提示:较长)。
...it demonstrated the qualities that Frost and Thomas had – quite independently – come to believe were essential to the making of good verse. For both men, the engine of poetry was not rhyme or even form but rhythm, and the organ by which it communicated was the listening ear as opposed to the reading eye.
, "The Road Not Taken" has been understood by some as an emblem of individual choice and self-reliance, a moral tale in which the traveller takes responsibility for – and so effects – his own destiny. But it was never intended to be read in this way by Frost, who was well aware of the playful ironies contained within it, and would warn audiences: "You have to be careful of that one; it's a tricky poem – very tricky."
To Thomas, it was not the least bit funny. It pricked at his confidence, at his sense of his own fraudulence, reminding him he was neither a true writer nor a true naturalist, cowardly in his lack of direction. And now the one man who understood his indecisiveness the most astutely – in particular, towards the war – appeared to be mocking him for it.
Frost insisted that Thomas was overreacting, and told his friend that he had failed to see that "the sigh was a mock sigh, hypocritical for the fun of the thing". But Thomas saw no such fun, and said so bluntly, adding that he doubted anyone would see the fun of the thing without Frost to guide them personally. Frost, in fact, had already discovered as much on reading the poem before a college audience, where it was "taken pretty seriously", he admitted, despite "doing my best to make it obvious by my manner that I was fooling . . . Mea culpa."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jul/29/robert-frost-edward-thomas-poetry _________________ the trouble with poetry is that it encourages the writing of more poetry -- Billy Collins |
|
返页首 |
|
|
|
|
|